{"id":10373,"date":"2020-10-18T06:43:14","date_gmt":"2020-10-18T05:43:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/?p=10373"},"modified":"2020-10-21T08:01:36","modified_gmt":"2020-10-21T07:01:36","slug":"theologians-philosophers-sufis-people-tradition-say-exegises-quran-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/10373\/theologians-philosophers-sufis-people-tradition-say-exegises-quran-2\/","title":{"rendered":"what the theologians, the philosophers, the Sufis and the people of tradition say about the exegesis of the Quran?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The people of tradition explained the Qur\u2019\u00e3n with the traditions ascribed to the companions and their disciples. They went ahead so long as there was a tradition to lead them on, and stopped when they could not find any such tradition (provided the meaning was not self-.evident). They thought it to be the only safe method, as All\u00e3h says: . . . and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge say: \u201cWe believe in it, it is all from our Lord\u2026\u201d (3:7).<\/p>\n<p>But they were mistaken. All\u00e3h has not said in His Book that rational proof had no validity. How could He say so when the authenticity of the Book itself depended on rational proof. On the other hand, He has never said that the words of the companions or their disciples had any value as religious proof. How could He say so when there were such glaring discrepancies in their opinions? In short, All\u00e3h has not called us to the sophistry which accepting and following contradictory opinions and views would entail. He has called us, instead, to meditate on the Qur\u2019\u00e3nic verses in order to remove any apparent discrepancy in them.<\/p>\n<p>All\u00e3h has revealed the Qur\u2019\u00e3n as a guidance, and has made it a light and an explanation of everything. Why should a light seek brightness from others&#8217; light? Why should a guidance be led by others&#8217; guidance? Why should \u201can explanation of everything\u201d be explained by others&#8217; words?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>All\u00e3h has not said in His Book that rational proof had no validity. How could He say so when the authenticity of the Book itself depended on rational proof. On the other hand, He has never said that the words of the companions or their disciples had any value as religious proof. How could He say so when there were such glaring discrepancies in their opinions?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":10376,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[19407,7563,19429,10822],"class_list":["post-10373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-exegises","tag-quran","tag-rational-argument","tag-shaistudies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10373\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10376"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shiastudies.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}