• Home
  • Bank of Subjects of Articles
    • Bibliography
    • Characters
    • Culture and art
    • Economics
    • Educational sciences
    • ethics
    • Geography of Islamic world
    • History
    • Islamic jurisprudence and principles
    • Kalam (Islamic scholastic theology)
    • Mahdism
    • Philosophy and logic
    • Political science
    • pray and pilgrimage
    • Prophet and Ahl-al bayt
  • Islamic Teachings
  • quran
  • The Infallibles
  • Shia Beliefs
  • Morality
  • Events
    • Media Reflection
    • Muharram
    • News of Shia World
    • News of Worldly Assembly for Shia Studies
  • Home
  • Bank of Subjects of Articles
    • Bibliography
    • Characters
    • Culture and art
    • Economics
    • Educational sciences
    • ethics
    • Geography of Islamic world
    • History
    • Islamic jurisprudence and principles
    • Kalam (Islamic scholastic theology)
    • Mahdism
    • Philosophy and logic
    • Political science
    • pray and pilgrimage
    • Prophet and Ahl-al bayt
  • Islamic Teachings
  • quran
  • The Infallibles
  • Shia Beliefs
  • Morality
  • Events
    • Media Reflection
    • Muharram
    • News of Shia World
    • News of Worldly Assembly for Shia Studies
Home Bank of Subjects of Articles Kalam (Islamic scholastic theology)

Comparing Imamiyya to Mutazila

by mustafa askari
2022-06-09
in Kalam (Islamic scholastic theology)
0
Comparing Imamiyya to Mutazila
0
SHARES
28
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The two most well-known theological sects within Sunnism are the Mutazila and Asha’ira. However, traditionalists (Alh Al-Hadith) and the Ashaira do not consider the Mutazila within the fold of Sunnism. However, insofar as the Mutazila do not believe in the divine selection of the Imam, we regard this school as nominally Sunni.

The Mutazila as a theological school was established in 105/723 by Wasil ibn Ata. He had previously been a follower of the school of Hasan Al-Basri, but he broke away and began attracting followers of his own. Wasil’s followers, due to their remarkable efforts against foreign heretical doctrines, began to attract attention. During the reign of the Abbasid Caliph, Mutawakkil (d. 240/861), the Mutazila lost its favoured position. The last prominent and distinguished figure of this school was Shaykh Mahmud Zamaskhari (d. 538/1144) whose Tafsir Al-Kashshaf revived interest in their doctrines.

After the death of its main figures, the teachings of the Mutazila were preserved in the Zaydi school of Shiism. The Zaydiyya of Yemen and other regions adopted the principles of this school, aside from its rejection of Ali’s successorship to the Prophet. As well as the Zaydiyya, the Maturidiyya in the East adopted many Mutazilite doctrines. The Maturidiyya were intellectually closer to the rationalists than the traditionalists. However, from another angle, the Maturidiyya and the Ashaʿira both belonged to Sunnism while being opposed to the traditionalist theologians.

Some of the doctrines of Mutazila, especially the impossibility of visibly seeing God in the Hereafter, have survived in the Ibadiyya sect. (For more on them, see the 3rd vol. of this series) Having briefly outlined the key differences between the Imamiyya and Mutazila, we shall leave its full discussion for the future.

Intercession

Islamic scholars unanimously believe that shafaa (intercession) is an authentic teaching of Islam, and that a sinner will be spared punishment due to the successful intercession of an intercessor. From this respect, intercession is only for those who have committed major sins; the Imamiyya and Asha’ira agree on this point. However, the Mutazila school holds that intercession is also available for the righteous, in the sense of elevating them to higher statuses in the Hereafter.

Punishment of a major sinner

According to the Imamiyya and Asha’ira, a person whose faith and belief in God is theoretically sound but commits a major sin out of his own desire is still a believer, but also a sinner (Fasiq). From the point of view of the Khawarij, he has become an unbeliever, while according to the Mutazila, he is neither a disbeliever nor a believer, but in an intermediate position.

Heaven and Hell

The Imamiyya and Ashāʿira believe that Heaven and Hell have been created and exist now and that God is aware of their condition. However, the Mutazila believe that they are not yet created.

Enjoining good and forbidding evil

The majority of the Imamiyya and all the Ashāʿira believe that enjoining good and forbidding evil is a religious rather than a rational obligation; if no proof in justification of this principle has been explicitly provided, that is only because it is not necessary to do so. This is because some of the Imamiyya and a great number of the Mutazila believe that enjoining good and forbidding evil is a rational duty, and it is our faculty of reason which urges us to it.

How good deeds are invalidated by bad ones

The Imamiyya and Ashāʿira believe that whatever a person does has its own value independent of other actions; therefore evil deeds cannot invalidate good ones and render them worthless. In other words, good deeds are only eliminated if the committed sin is polytheism (shirk) or disbelief (Kufr). In this case, all the previous good deeds to turn to nothing. However, for the Muʿtazila the sphere of invalidation (Ihbat) is wider. They believe that a person who has spent his or her whole life worshipping and obeying God, by virtue of a single lie could become like one who has not worshipped God at all, even for one moment.

The relationship between religion and reason

The Imamiyya consider reason to be a tool to infer and extract secondary principles, without exaggerating its role or position. The Mutazila, on the other hand, use reason to reinterpret those external acts of the Sharia and Sunna which do not conform to their own principles, such as the notion of intercession, which they interpret as a means to elevation in the Hereafter.

Repentance

The Imamiyya and Ashāʿira hold that God’s acceptance of repentance is a form of divine grace, as if it were not for God’s kindness, there could be no forgiveness of sins. On the other hand, the Mutazila believe that the promise of forgiveness from one’s sins is an essential rational precondition for repentance and turning away from sin.

The Prophets and Angels

The Imamiyya believe that the Prophets are superior to the angels but the Mutazila believe the contrary.

Determinism versus free will

The Imamiyya maintain that the human being is not subject to predestination and that whatever he does is the result of his own free choice. However, this does not mean that man is completely autonomous or that his actions exist independently of God either. However, the Mutazila believe man is autonomous and his actions are independent.

Mankind’s need for revelation

The Imamiyya say that the human being, in order to fulfil their moral duties, is in need of divine guidance in the form of prophets, without whom he would go astray. On the other hand the Mutazila claim that human reason is capable of identifying a person’s moral duties independent of external guidance.

These are the differences between the Imamiyya and Mutazila schools; it is to be noted that many of the Ashaira agree with the Imamiyya on the aforementioned mentioned principles. Furthermore, insofar as these principles are mostly theological rather than doctrinal, it is not necessary for individual Muslims to affirm every last detail of them, and disagreements on these issues should not be a source of strife among the Muslims.

Source:shafaqna

Tags: Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.)Imam 'AliIslamprophet
Previous Post

The main reasons behind the uprising of Imam Hussain (AS) against Yazid

Next Post

Abu Dharr al-Ghifari became a complete human being in School of Islam

mustafa askari

Related Posts

The Captivity Journey
ethics

The Captivity Journey

by mustafa askari
2023-07-10
Why Shiism is named Jafri religion?
Kalam (Islamic scholastic theology)

Why Shiism is named Jafri religion?

by mustafa askari
2022-10-24
Islamic Teachings

The Ninety Nine Attributes of Allah part five

by javad
2022-02-10
Islamic Teachings

Transitory Nature Of The World

by javad
2022-02-10
Islamic jurisprudence and principles

Tendency of Rationalizing the Laws of the Shariah

by javad
2021-12-02
Next Post
Abu Dharr al-Ghifari became a complete human being in School of Islam

Abu Dharr al-Ghifari became a complete human being in School of Islam

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Post

10 facts about marriage in Islam

10 facts about marriage in Islam

2025-05-26
A Clear Message in Response to the Arrogance of Donald Trump

A Clear Message in Response to the Arrogance of Donald Trump

2025-05-24
The Grand Ayatollah Sistani & the Grand Ayatollah Javadi Amoli Met in Najaf Ashraf

The Grand Ayatollah Sistani & the Grand Ayatollah Javadi Amoli Met in Najaf Ashraf

2025-05-19
Imam Ali (AS) Did Not Compromise on Unethical Politics

Imam Ali (AS) Did Not Compromise on Unethical Politics

2025-05-11
UK: Reform councillors face allegations of sharing social media Islamophobic content

UK: Reform councillors face allegations of sharing social media Islamophobic content

2025-05-11
How to be just with your children?

How to be just with your children?

2025-05-10
Load More

Browse by Tags

Ahl al-Bayt (A.S.) Ahlul Bayt Al-Mahdi (AS) Allah Ashura Ayatollah Sobhani Ethics faith Fatima fiqh ghadir God History Holy Prophet Imam 'Ali Imam Ali (A.S.) Imam Husain Imams infallibles Islam Islamic Laws Islamic rules Jurisprudence Karbala Martyrdom morality Muhammad Nahj al Balaghah prayer prophet Quran Ramadan Reborn Salat Sayed Moustafa Qazwini shaistudies shia Shia Beliefs Shia Imams Shia Islam Shia Studie's World Assembly shiastudies Sin the differences between Shi’a and Sunni the story of those who converted to Shia Islam

The World Assembly of Shiite Studies was established in 2003 (1382 AH) by a group of scholars from seminaries and universities. The purpose of founding this independent academic institution was to introduce the school of Shi‘ism and defend its legitimacy through education, research, translation and publication, communications, and Islamic promotion. This center has continued its mission with strength and determination and envisions a bright future ahead.

Address: Qom, 45-Meter Ammar Yaser Boulevard, between Alley 4 and 6, World Assembly of Shiite Studies, Secretariat of Religious Scholars

Phone: +982537713773

Fax: +982537713774

All rights of the website are reserved and belong to the World Assembly of Shiite Studies.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?